Monday, December 21, 2015

Gusto Is Valued At $1 Billion In New Funding Round - Daily Business

Gusto / Via youtube.com

Gusto, the human resources startup formerly known as Zenpayroll, has been valued at $1 billion in a new financing round, doubling its valuation in under a year, the CEO told BuzzFeed News.

Gusto raised $50 million in the round, according to its CEO, Joshua Reeves. The new cash came from the company's existing investors, including Google Capital and General Catalyst Partners, and will help finance the startup's effort to expand in the highly competitive world of human resources software aimed at small businesses.

Though known for its payroll processing software, Gusto recently announced a foray into employee benefits, including health insurance. That put it into competition with a bigger startup, Zenefits, a fast-growing insurance broker that offers free HR software.

Partially in response to Gusto's move, Zenefits secretly developed its own payroll processing service, codenamed "Project Nutshot," BuzzFeed News reported at the time.

Gusto, which launched three years ago, collects revenue from subscriptions to its software. With the introduction of its benefits service, it now collects recurring commissions on health insurance plans as well. Reeves declined to discuss the company's finances.

Gusto's latest financing round was disclosed in a securities filing on Friday and reported earlier by VentureBeat. The $1 billion valuation, however, has not previously been disclosed.

In April, the startup announced a Series B round that gave it a $500 million valuation, or $560 million including the new capital. The new valuation of $1 billion does not include the $50 million capital infusion, according to Reeves.

Reeves said Gusto didn't need to raise the money and had around $50 million in the bank as of November. He said the financing round gave Gusto "a chance to build a relationship with a few of our key investors."

Rejecting alphabetical dictates, he described the round as a "Series B2," rather than a Series C.

"We decided to call it a Series B2 because we weren't really going to do any PR or have it be a big focus," he told BuzzFeed News. "We didn't really need the capital, per se."

"Technically you can call it whatever you want," he continued. "You can call it a Series Zebra or a Series Panda if you want. We just decided to call it a B2 because it felt like more of an opportunistic, quick process."


via IFTTT

Cheerios Sales Are Growing Again After Switch To Gluten Free - Daily Business

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

Cheerios sales have gone the way of most American cereals recently: down. So this year, manufacturer General Mills decided to make five varieties gluten-free to appeal to America's growing numbers of people avoiding the protein. Early signs now suggest the switch is having some success.

Sales of full-price, gluten-free varieties of Cheerios grew 3% to 4% last quarter, the company said, showing the fist signs of improvement after multiple quarters of declines (General Mills said it tracked sales of the full-priced product as a measure of consumer interest independent of any discounts).

"The launch of gluten-free Cheerios is an important component of our cereal growth plan and we’re encouraged by the results thus far," CEO Ken Powell said on an earnings call Thursday.

Other brands didn't fare as well: overall, General Mills' U.S. cereal sales fell 5% last quarter. "Our top priority in U.S. retail this year is to drive growth in cereal," Powell said.

General Mills

The news of a Cheerios sales lift follows an embarrassing recall of 1.8 million boxes of Cheerios and Honey Nut Cheerios in October, shortly after General Mills announced these varieties were going gluten-free.

After dozens of consumers reported getting ill from eating the cereal, General Mills discovered a factory in California had been using gluten-filled wheat flour for a few days due to "human error," the company said at the time. The effect of the recall now appears to have been short-lived.

"We saw minor slowdown the week of the recall and since then baselines have returned to growth," Powell told investors. "Obviously the recall was a stumble, but the fundamental consumer reaction is in line if not a little bit better than we anticipated at this point," he said.

General Mills plans to increase marketing for gluten-free Cheerios, and is also rolling out gluten-free Lucky Charms.

Gluten-Free Cheerios Recalled After Tests Find They Contain Gluten

Can An Old-School Cereal Giant Ride The Gluten-Free Wave?


via IFTTT

Rent The Runway's "Exclusive" Dresses Are Sold Cheaper Elsewhere - Daily Business

The rental site has quietly introduced its own in-house labels, but the same products are often sold by department store websites at big discounts.

Kris Connor / Getty Images

Rent the Runway's supposedly exclusive private label dresses are showing up elsewhere online at discount prices, in some cases for hundreds of dollars less than the retail prices listed by the site.

When one customer complained after seeing a Slate & Willow dress she ordered — which Rent the Runway said retailed for $595 — on sale at Nordstrom under a different label for $118, a customer service staffer gave her a refund. The representative did not make clear that the Slate & Willow brand she rented was a Rent the Runway creation.

After BuzzFeed News asked about the price discrepancy between the two dresses, the company dropped its retail price by a whopping $250. Now, the listing for the once-$595 dress says its "retail price" is $345.

Until Friday, Rent the Runway said this dress had a retail value of $595.

Until Friday, Rent the Runway said this dress had a retail value of $595.

Rent the Runway

Now it's $345.

Now it's $345.

Rent the Runway


View Entire List ›


via IFTTT

Martin Shkreli Says Prosecutors Targeted Him For Drug Price-Hike - Daily Business

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, the pharmaceutical executive said increasing the price of Daraprim led to his arrest.

Craig Ruttle / AP

Speaking for the first time since his arrest Thursday, pharmaceutical executive Martin Shkreli told the Wall Street Journal he was targeted by federal prosecutors for increasing the price of a life-saving drug.

Shkreli was charged last week with securities fraud for allegedly using assets of new companies to pay off debts from bad trades he made while running two hedge funds. Once auditors and regulators began monitoring Shkreli's actions he and his attorney allegedly used cash and stock from Retrophin – a publicly traded company Shrekli founded in 2011 – to settle his debts. He pleaded not guilty and was released on $5 million bail. He faces 20 years in prison if convicted.

He became the subject of widespread scorn in September for defiantly raising the price of Daraprim from $13.50 to $750 a pill, an increase he defended as "a good business decision."

On Friday he resigned as CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals and on Monday KaloBios Pharmaceuticals removed him as CEO.

"'Trying to find anything we could to stop him,' was the attitude of the government," Shkreli, who was surrounded by his lawyers, told the Wall Street Journal in an interview in New York Sunday. "Beating the person up and then trying to find the merits to make up for it – I would have hoped the government wouldn't take that kind of approach."

Shkreli also said that he believes he was arrested, "because of a social experiment and teasing people over the Internet," referring to his online antics including live streaming his day-to-day activities and answering questions from social media followers.

"That seems like a real injustice," he told the Wall Street Journal, adding that he took offense at the U.S. Attorney referencing his actions as a "Ponzi-like scheme."

That "is nowhere near reality," he said. "The indictment doesn't use that word."

Shkreli said he didn't left his Midtown apartment all weekend as photographers are waiting outside. On Sunday, his Twitter, email, and cell phone were hacked. On Monday morning, he tweeted that he has regained control of his account.

Shreli, who earlier this month said he paid about $2 million for the only known copy of the Wu-Tang Clan's new album, Once Upon a Time in Shaolin, said he wants to explain his side of the story but prosecutors "rushed to write" the indictment.

"Most people don't know the real Martin Shkreli," he said. "I think it would make sense to show them."

LINK: Martin Shkreli Allegedly Told Investors He Had $35 Million; He Really Had $700

LINK: Martin Shkreli Resigns As CEO Of Turing Pharmaceuticals


View Entire List ›


via IFTTT

"Star Wars: The Force Awakens" Has Record-Setting $238 Million Debut - Daily Business

And with another $279 million internationally, the Force is definitely strong with this film.

BB-8 and Daisy Ridley in Star Wars: The Force Awakens.

Lucasfilm

Breaking almost every major box office record on the books, Star Wars: The Force Awakens debuted this weekend with $238 million at the North American box office, according to estimates released by Disney. The seventh film in the Star Wars saga has surpassed Jurassic World's $208.8 million domestic opening weekend record from June 2015, setting a massive new watermark for success at the box office, especially during the holiday season.

With The Force Awakens' debut, 2015 now features three of the top domestic opening weekends of all time.

With The Force Awakens' debut, 2015 now features three of the top domestic opening weekends of all time.

Adam B. Vary / BuzzFeed News

To fully understand the magnitude of The Force Awakens' box office achievement, consider that the film's record-setting $120.5 million opening day (including Thursday night's earnings) was already enough to give it the all-time best debut in December, surpassing the $84.6 million debut of 2012's The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Until now, studios would never expect a summer blockbuster-style box office opening in the final month of the year, when holiday shopping and travel naturally syphons away potential ticket buyers.


View Entire List ›


via IFTTT

Inside The Porn Industry's Reckoning Over Sexual Assault - Daily Business

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Saturday, December 19, 2015

Star Wars Lifts Disney Up, But Cable Cutters Could Bring It Down - Daily Business

Lucasfilm

With what could become the highest-earning movie in history hitting cinema screens this weekend, the Force may be with Disney in the short term. But the fully operational Death Star of expensive sports rights is getting ready to destroy the company's impressive profits, one analyst says.

Massive investments in sports rights — like the $15.2 billion the Disney-owned ESPN paid for 10 more years of NFL rights in 2011 — could drag the company down, BTIG analyst Rich Greenfield argued in a note Friday, even as its ability to churn out massively popular movies, TV shows, toys, and theme park rides has never been stronger.

Greenfield said he expected Disney earnings to be lower than other analysts expect for 2017 and 2018, calling their estimates for those years "too high" and "far too high" respectively. His price target for Disney shares is now $90, about 17% below the $108 it was trading at on Friday.

After the release of Star Wars: The Force Awakens Thursday, Wall Street joined the throngs of fans in cheering the film, even if the bankers were more interested in the dollar signs than the lightsabers.

"The Force is Strong Here...and Lucrative," Nomura analysts wrote after seeing the movie, predicting it could pull in $3 billion in box office receipts all over the world. Box Office Mojo reported that the Thursday screenings set a record for early showings, with $57 million on opening night.

Star Wars maker Lucasfilm, which Disney acquired in late 2012, fits well into the company's "cross-division monetization engine," Nomura said, using a very Darth Vader turn of phrase. With "at least" five Star Wars movies coming through 2019, the Nomura analysts are "optimistic Disney can propel sustained cross-segment synergies going forward."

Frozen, Disney's last film-toy-music cross-promotional gold mine, had a worldwide box office gross of $1.3 billion. Nomura said that revenue from Star Wars consumer products could be as high as $930 million, while Frozen generated some $700 million in revenue for consumer products.

That's a lot of money for toys and T-shirts, but Star Wars is a money machine even without new movies: Nomura estimates that $260 million of Disney's $4 billion in consumer products revenue in 2014 came from Star Wars.

Lucasfilm

But a force more powerful than any blockbuster looms over Disney. Overall, 44% of the company's operating profit comes from cable television, and people are cutting their cords and switching to streaming their entertainment faster than anybody expected.

Even with the Star Wars franchise kicking into high gear again, Disney's operating income is expected to be flat in the 2017 fiscal year thanks to cable income going down. Industry watchers have predicted that The Force Awakens could earn $2.6 billion in box office revenue, which Disney needs to meet Wall Street targets.

"If Star Wars Episode VII does not exceed $2.0 billion in worldwide box office revenue, Disney will miss our FY2016 and consensus earnings estimates as well," Greenfield said.

Disney stock closed down almost 4% Friday, despite the record-setting Star Wars box office and critical acclaim for the film.

Another problem for Disney, Greenfield argued, is that it has been eagerly providing its content to online streaming services. This has propped up its revenues in the short term, but those well-stocked streaming options have made it much easier for consumers to get rid of their cable packages, or migrate to less expensive ones that may not include the full suite of Disney channels

"As more great content from Disney and others flow onto [streaming] platforms, more time shifts away from live, linear TV, accelerating ratings declines and in turn, advertising revenues," Greenfield wrote last month.

Disney CEO Bob Iger blamed some of the cord-cutting on "economic factors," but he did note that "young people are not signing up as quickly as they once did."

Or, as Obi-Wan Kenobi put it when Alderaan was destroyed by the Empire, "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened."

Lucasfilm

Alderaan will never recover, but investors and analysts are more optimistic about Disney's prospects. While entertainment and cable TV companies have had a bad 2015 — motivated in large part by the looming threat of cable cutting — Disney shares have been on a relative tear, rising about 15% so far this year. Viacom shares are down 47% for the year, 21st Century Fox is down 25%, and Discovery Communications is down 24%.

Greenfield attributes this bout of investor optimism to excitement about Star Wars and how a movie that doesn't suck as badly as The Phantom Menace could ramp up Disney's business.

In a regulatory filing, Nomura analysts noted, Disney said it was expanding its Hollywood Studios for more Star Wars space and building a "Star Wars-themed land" at the Disneyland resort. In the last year, attendance at the parks grew 5% and revenue grew 7%.

Early this year, the Wall Street Journal quoted another analyst arguing that Disney's ability to consistently milk profits from its valuable intellectual property (think Marvel, Star Wars, and Pixar) made it more like a branded consumer products company like Nike, rather than other movie or TV studios.

Investors tend to place a higher value on consumer branded products because their sales are more predictable, unlike the ups and downs of entertainment (people will buy Nike shoes every year, but if Paramount's movies are bad, people will desert them in a flash). Nike's shares, for instance, are valued at about 33 times last year's earnings, while Disney's trade at about 21 times, and Fox's trade at 7 times.

But things may not go as well as planned.

But things may not go as well as planned.

Regardless of its Jedi-driven revenues, "Disney is a cable network company that has the highest level of fixed costs (sports rights) in the industry," Greenfield warned.

And those fixed costs have pushed ESPN to control its variable costs, which means, in many cases, firing people. The company recently laid off 300 employees and parted ways with high-profile, expensive talent like Keith Olbermann and Bill Simmons. Nielsen data shows that ESPN lost 3.2 million subscribers in 2015 — even as it invested in hugely expensive sports rights packages. Its NBA deal went from costing $485 million a year to $1.47 billion a year.

The NBA deal, Greenfield says, will make ESPN's cost structure "notably higher" in 2017 and will reduce operating profit from its cable network in 2017 and have it grow slowly in 2018.

Nomura analysts argue that Disney's cable business is stronger than Nielsen's subscriber data may show — they point out that ESPN has gained some subscriptions from "skinny" bundles of cable channels, like Dish Network's Sling TV service.

In a conference call with analysts in November, Disney chief Bob Iger said the company is "seizing the opportunity to basically distribute our content with these new entrants," including "smaller bundles," which he said are "attractive to young people."

Disney chief Bob Iger and his wife, Willow Bay, at the 2015 Academy Awards.

Mark Ralston / Getty Images




via IFTTT